« [OT] 22,000 dead, and This White Guy - W... | Main | Start a movement! Donate all your Google... »

Certainly Suzanne Cook is the definitive source for details on Assembly.Load and Binding Contexts, a black art tantamount to voodoo that few people understand. Patrick and I have been hip-deep in it lately, and have discovered/uncovered/madecleartoourselves how some of this voodoo works. Here's a (annotated) writeup from Patrick that was sent out internally. Another great resource is Mike Gunderloy's article on Binding Policy in .NET.

  • Assemblies will only EVER be loaded from the GAC based on a full bind (name, version, and public key token).  A partial bind with name and public key token only WON’T load from the GAC. 
    • If you reference an assembly with VS.NET you're asking for a full bind. If you say Assembly.Load("foo") you're asking for a partial bind.
  • However, the way this usually works is…
    • You do a partial bind on assembly name, or name and public key token with Assembly.Load
    • Fusion (the code name for the Assembly Loader/Binder) starts walking the probing path looking for an assembly that matches the partial bind.
    • Counter Intuititive: If it finds one while probing (the first one) it will then attempt to use the strong name of the one it found to do a full bind against the GAC.
    • If it’s in the GAC, that’s the one that gets loaded.
    • Any of that loaded assemblies will try to load from the GAC first without going to the probing path, since the embedded references constitute a full bind.
    • If they aren’t found in the GAC, then it will start probing.
    • It’ll grab the first one it finds in the probing path.  If the versions don’t match, Fusion fails.  If they do match, Fusion loads that one.
    • So, if you specify a partial name, and the file is in the GAC, but not the probing path, the load fails, since there’s no way to do a full bind.  

All this is mostly an issue for plugins that we load dynamically.  It shouldn’t be an issue for compile-time dependencies, since they use full binds.  One way to make sure you get what you expect is to specify a full bind in your config files via an Assembly Qualified Name (QN) like:  "Foo.Bar, Version=2.0.205.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=59388ae2d2746794" and doing something like this:

  100 public static object CreateInstance(string assemblyandtype)
101 {
102 Type type = Type.GetType(assemblyandtype);
103 object instance = null;
104 instance = type.InvokeMember(String.Empty,BindingFlags.CreateInstance, null, null, null);
105 return instance;
106 }

Thanks to Patrick for the writeup!

Tracked by:
"re: And we're off! TechEd 2005 Frameowkr planning is ON [Kit George]" (BCLTeam'... [Trackback]


Comments are closed.

Contact

Sponsors

Hosting By

Hot Topics

Tags

Calendar

<November 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Archives

November, 2009 (5)
October, 2009 (19)
September, 2009 (11)
August, 2009 (12)
July, 2009 (21)
June, 2009 (26)
May, 2009 (16)
April, 2009 (13)
March, 2009 (17)
February, 2009 (17)
January, 2009 (18)
December, 2008 (32)
November, 2008 (17)
October, 2008 (22)
September, 2008 (16)
August, 2008 (14)
July, 2008 (25)
June, 2008 (19)
May, 2008 (17)
April, 2008 (17)
March, 2008 (26)
February, 2008 (21)
January, 2008 (28)
December, 2007 (19)
November, 2007 (17)
October, 2007 (31)
September, 2007 (39)
August, 2007 (37)
July, 2007 (43)
June, 2007 (37)
May, 2007 (32)
April, 2007 (38)
March, 2007 (29)
February, 2007 (46)
January, 2007 (31)
December, 2006 (27)
November, 2006 (31)
October, 2006 (32)
September, 2006 (39)
August, 2006 (34)
July, 2006 (40)
June, 2006 (18)
May, 2006 (31)
April, 2006 (34)
March, 2006 (30)
February, 2006 (38)
January, 2006 (44)
December, 2005 (19)
November, 2005 (34)
October, 2005 (24)
September, 2005 (37)
August, 2005 (20)
July, 2005 (24)
June, 2005 (33)
May, 2005 (16)
April, 2005 (22)
March, 2005 (34)
February, 2005 (15)
January, 2005 (37)
December, 2004 (28)
November, 2004 (30)
October, 2004 (34)
September, 2004 (22)
August, 2004 (34)
July, 2004 (18)
June, 2004 (64)
May, 2004 (49)
April, 2004 (21)
March, 2004 (29)
February, 2004 (29)
January, 2004 (36)
December, 2003 (25)
November, 2003 (24)
October, 2003 (59)
September, 2003 (42)
August, 2003 (24)
July, 2003 (44)
June, 2003 (29)
May, 2003 (21)
April, 2003 (30)
March, 2003 (27)
February, 2003 (47)
January, 2003 (50)
December, 2002 (31)
November, 2002 (38)
October, 2002 (44)
September, 2002 (15)
May, 2002 (2)
April, 2002 (4)

Google Ads