Scott Hanselman

Hanselminutes Podcast 28 - Open Source Options

August 10, '06 Comments [7] Posted in Podcast
Sponsored By

My twenty-eighth Podcast is up. This episode is about the Open Source Community. This is a pretty open ended talk, as there really isn't an easy solution.

We're listed in the iTunes Podcast Directory, so I encourage you to subscribe with a single click (two in Firefox) with the button below. For those of you on slower connections there are lo-fi and torrent-based versions as well.

This show was FULL of links, so here they are again. They are also always on the show site. Do also remember the archives are always up and they have PDF Transcripts, a little known feature.

Links from the Show

Blog: Is Open Source A Crap Idea? (h73)
Open Source: Free as in "Free" (h77)
Free as in Beer (h7c)
Blog: Patching with CVS/Diff Files (h74)
Free like a Puppy (h79)
Open Source Licenses (h7d)
Blog: Patching an OS Project (h75)
The Free Software Definition (h7a)
Problems in OS Licensing (h7e)
Free Like a Flower (h76)
Categories of Free and Non-Free Software (h7b)
WP: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch (h78)

Subscribe to my Podcast in iTunes

NEW COUPON CODE EXCLUSIVELY FOR HANSELMINUTES LISTENERS: The folks at XCeed are giving Hanselminutes listeners that is Coupon Code "hm-20-20." It'll work on their online shop or over the phone. This is an amazing deal, and I encourage you to check our their stuff. The coupon is good for 20% off any component or suite, with or without subscription, for 1 developer all the way up to a site license.

Our sponsors are XCeed, CodeSmith Tools, PeterBlum and the .NET Dev Journal. There's a $100 off CodeSmith coupon for Hanselminutes listeners - it's coupon code HM100. Spread the word, now's the time to buy.

As I've said before this show comes to you with the audio expertise and stewardship of Carl Franklin. The name comes from Travis Illig, but the goal of the show is simple. Avoid wasting the listener's time. (and make the commute less boring)

  • The basic MP3 feed is here, and the iPod friendly one is here. There's a number of other ways you can get it (streaming, straight download, etc) that are all up on the site just below the fold. I use iTunes, myself, to listen to most podcasts, but I also use FeedDemon and it's built in support.
  • Note that for now, because of bandwidth constraints, the feeds always have just the current show. If you want to get an old show (and because many Podcasting Clients aren't smart enough to not download the file more than once) you can always find them at http://www.hanselminutes.com.
  • I have, and will, also include the enclosures to this feed you're reading, so if you're already subscribed to ComputerZen and you're not interested in cluttering your life with another feed, you have the choice to get the 'cast as well.
  • If there's a topic you'd like to hear, perhaps one that is better spoken than presented on a blog, or a great tool you can't live without, contact me and I'll get it in the queue!

Enjoy. Who knows what'll happen in the next show?

About Scott

Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. I am a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.

facebook twitter subscribe
About   Newsletter
Sponsored By
Hosting By
Dedicated Windows Server Hosting by ORCS Web
Thursday, August 10, 2006 4:13:26 PM UTC
I don't know how you did it, but I'm starting to listen to these. I *told* you that I don't do Podcasts. I'd prefer to just read as podcasts take up more time which is fleeting.

But NOOO, you had to discuss such interesting topics that I cannot NOT listen. (yes, double negative, live with it).

Damn you.
Thursday, August 10, 2006 8:26:02 PM UTC
I think that CodeSmith coupon has expired. At least that's what someone from CodeSmith told my manager when he tried purchasing a copy from the site http://www.codesmithtools.com.
LordHits
Thursday, August 10, 2006 8:39:04 PM UTC
I'd like to submit a patch to this blog post (I didn't see any place to submit bugs though).

The 12th word (13 if you consider hyphenated words to be 2 words) in the body of the post should be Open, not Option. Could you do a post sometime on the procedure for submitting a patch so I don't have to post a comment like this? ;)

Seriously though, thanks for the walk-through post on using TortoiseSVN and Subversion to contribute to the open source community.
Thursday, August 10, 2006 8:58:59 PM UTC
Scott I really really really appreciate your taking up the cause for OpenSource! It's a major endeavour to keep these projects going, and your walkthrough of creating a patch is awesome.

I'm lucky enough with the CSK (http://www.commercestarterkit.org) to have some great volunteers (like Chris Cyvas, Mark Schiavetta, and J Sawyer) - I hope they keep coming! Articles like yours will hopefully inspire them.

Chris recently posted a nice idea on his blog (DasBlog of course) about a "1% Pledge". It's a pretty cool idea...

http://blog.chriscyvas.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=5e730bce-715d-4c04-9fa1-2b8510bdb8bd
Sunday, August 13, 2006 3:25:47 AM UTC
I ran across a forum thread where two guys were aguing which license is more 'free', MIT/BSD versus GPL. The main difference being that you can take MIT/BSD code, package it up, and sell it in a retail box if you want -- there are basically no restrictions whatsoever.

-- You, and the people supporting licenses like MIT, use a definition of 'freedom' that maximizes choice for the largest number of people, optimizing across the *first* round of choices after you release the license. That trades-off more choices for more people about what to do with the licensed code today for a risk that subsequent changes may permit fewer choices for some people in future. Nothing wrong with that, and there are plenty of people out there who use a similar definition.

-- Stallman and the people advocating GPL use a definition of 'freedom' that maximizes choice for the largest number of people, optimizing across *all future* rounds. That trades-off a reduced immediate 'freedom' for some (the GPL restrictions you mention) for a guarantee of the same amount of 'freedom' for all people in all future rounds. Despite your personal FUD, there's nothing inherently wrong with that, either. And clearly, there are a lot of people who use a similar definition.

Despite what you may think, this doesn't mean that MIT is better than GPL -- or that GPL is better than MIT -- or that BSD is better than Linux -- or even that Betamax is better than VHS ;-). It is literally impossible to predict which strategy will result in greater total 'freedom' without making some pretty strong assumptions about (a) the relative size of the first v. subsequent-round audiences, (b) the proportion of each audience that would actually want to do something contrary to the license in question if given the opportunity, and (c) the current context and future direction of the particular OS application and its community.

In other words, both options maximize choice for an arbitrarily large group of people: they just each define the group differently. And as both economists and psychologists can tell you, when used in a predictive capacity, those two strategies are more a matter of individual taste than right v. wrong. Some people ride motorcycles off-road without helmets; others won't get out of bed unless the insurance policy is paid-up. Taste for risk varies, as does future-orientation.

---

With me, personally, the license is secondary to the community around the project. But all things being equal, I probably feel a little bit 'safer' contributing to an GPL project. The reason is, I know that the core team of committers isn't just going to take the code with my work in it, package it up in a box, and stop releasing future generations of it to the public, leaving me stranded. But generally, if I'm committing to a project it's because I like the community, and I rarely consider the differene between GPL and BSD in that context.
Jon
Sunday, August 13, 2006 3:28:28 AM UTC
Whoops, the quoting isn't very obvious there. I hope it's clear that the 'You' there is not referring to anyone on this site! It's just an artifact from the argument. The quoted text was supposed to be -- You, and ... future-orientation.

jon
Jon
Wednesday, August 16, 2006 12:40:18 AM UTC
Great stuff!

Keep it coming.

Hooked on Hanselminutes!
Saud Aziz
Comments are closed.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.