« XmlSerializers Part II: Am I Insane? | Main | PacMan written entirely in Excel... »

Looks like a little bit of wisdom from Kevin Dente has solved the mystery.

He sez:

A little Reflectoring into the XMLSerializer source shows that in .NET 1.1 it caches the temp assembly using both the type and default namespace as the key. However, 1.0 cached only on the type, and if you specified a namespace it ignored the cache. And it looks like even in 1.1 the other constructor overloads ignore the cache. Good to know.

And the reflectoring shows just that: (Note the Monitor.Enter [lock()] around their cache)

public XmlSerializer(Type type, string defaultNamespace){ 
  XmlReflectionImporter importer1;
  TempAssemblyCache cache1;
  this.events = 0;
  base..ctor();
  this.events.sender = this;
  this.tempAssembly = XmlSerializer.cache[defaultNamespace, type];
  if (this.tempAssembly == null){
    cache1 = XmlSerializer.cache;
    Monitor.Enter(XmlSerializer.cache);
    try{
       this.tempAssembly = XmlSerializer.cache[defaultNamespace, type];
       if (this.tempAssembly == null){
          importer1 = new XmlReflectionImporter(defaultNamespace);
          this.tempAssembly = XmlSerializer.GenerateTempAssembly(importer1.ImportTypeMapping(type));
          XmlSerializer.cache.Add(defaultNamespace, type, this.tempAssembly);
     }
}
finally{  Monitor.Exit(cache1); } } }

Tracked by:
http://benjaminm.net/PermaLink.aspx?guid=1a221088-bcff-4a8c-a601-103293ef6c9f [Pingback]
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=e69fcb4c-7aaf-4b9d-9f18-bea295... [Pingback]


Monday, December 08, 2003 9:43:16 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
Hmm, this got me thinking. If you do use a constructor form that doesn't take advantage of the XmlSerializer's built in-cache, what happens to that temp assembly? Will it get garbage collected eventually? I know assemblies that are loaded from files never get unloaded until the appdomain unloads, but what happens with dynamic assemblies? I haven't found a good explanation of that.

In response to your original question, by my reading of the code it looks like the XmlSerializer is thread-safe. Do you agree? I may need to use the XmlAttributeOverrides version of the XmlSerializer, and it looks like it would be safe to cache a copy of that sucker in a static somewhere.
Comments are closed.

Contact

Sponsors

Hosting By

Hot Topics

Tags

Calendar

<November 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Archives

November, 2009 (5)
October, 2009 (19)
September, 2009 (11)
August, 2009 (12)
July, 2009 (21)
June, 2009 (26)
May, 2009 (16)
April, 2009 (13)
March, 2009 (17)
February, 2009 (17)
January, 2009 (18)
December, 2008 (32)
November, 2008 (17)
October, 2008 (22)
September, 2008 (16)
August, 2008 (14)
July, 2008 (25)
June, 2008 (19)
May, 2008 (17)
April, 2008 (17)
March, 2008 (26)
February, 2008 (21)
January, 2008 (28)
December, 2007 (19)
November, 2007 (17)
October, 2007 (31)
September, 2007 (39)
August, 2007 (37)
July, 2007 (43)
June, 2007 (37)
May, 2007 (32)
April, 2007 (38)
March, 2007 (29)
February, 2007 (46)
January, 2007 (31)
December, 2006 (27)
November, 2006 (31)
October, 2006 (32)
September, 2006 (39)
August, 2006 (34)
July, 2006 (40)
June, 2006 (18)
May, 2006 (31)
April, 2006 (34)
March, 2006 (30)
February, 2006 (38)
January, 2006 (44)
December, 2005 (19)
November, 2005 (34)
October, 2005 (24)
September, 2005 (37)
August, 2005 (20)
July, 2005 (24)
June, 2005 (33)
May, 2005 (16)
April, 2005 (22)
March, 2005 (34)
February, 2005 (15)
January, 2005 (37)
December, 2004 (28)
November, 2004 (30)
October, 2004 (34)
September, 2004 (22)
August, 2004 (34)
July, 2004 (18)
June, 2004 (64)
May, 2004 (49)
April, 2004 (21)
March, 2004 (29)
February, 2004 (29)
January, 2004 (36)
December, 2003 (25)
November, 2003 (24)
October, 2003 (59)
September, 2003 (42)
August, 2003 (24)
July, 2003 (44)
June, 2003 (29)
May, 2003 (21)
April, 2003 (30)
March, 2003 (27)
February, 2003 (47)
January, 2003 (50)
December, 2002 (31)
November, 2002 (38)
October, 2002 (44)
September, 2002 (15)
May, 2002 (2)
April, 2002 (4)

Google Ads