Scott Hanselman

Verizon FIOS TV - Review and Photo Gallery

January 18, '08 Comments [30] Posted in Musings | Reviews
Sponsored By

CIMG8065We are finally out from under Comcast Cable and have just hooked up Verizon's new Fiber-Optic based FIOS TV. There's a long waiting list in my state, so I signed up in October and had it installed just this last week. We already had FIOS internet, with 15 megabits downstream and upstream (a premium service that costs an extra $10 a month) and have been very happy with it.

There is an ONT (Optical Network Terminal) (here's a network diagram) that is a installed on the outside of your house. This device is the bridge between the fiber optic cable that comes right up to your house but not inside and whatever wiring you have in your house.

If you have basic needs, often Verizon will just put a wireless router in your garage and call it done, giving you wireless Internet access as far as that router reaches. In the last six months, however, Verizon has started using routers that include a Coax connector such that the FIOS signal(s) can run over 75OHM Coax cable, switching from Fiber to Coax at the ONT - using the cable you likely already have running through your house into each room. The installer should do a signal test to check for loss over long runs and through splitters. My installer was very happy with the professional splitter I'd preinstalled in my wiring closet, saying that he wasn't able to measure that any signal was lost at all. He said that this speaks to good wiring and a good splitter. He had a certain level that we couldn't certify below, so make sure you ask your installer if the signal is sufficient for a glitch-free installation.

Since I had Verizon FIOS Internet already, hooking up the TV was easy for the installer. He used my existing Coax spliter and split the wire before the router. So, the coax comes in from the outside then splits and heads into all the rooms in the house, with one of the downstream cables going into the Verizon Internet Router's Coax connector. From there the router speaks TCP/IP over RJ-45 and supplies the house, but it also can hand out IP addresses over Coax to the DVR (Digital Video Recorders) that you'll receive with the FIOS TV Package.

There is an optional Media DVR option that will let you watch pictures and share video between the DVRs using the router and TCP/IP for transport, but I decided against that option since my XBoxen already do that fine.

Set Top Box (DVR)

CIMG8056Verizon uses the Motorola QIP6416 set-top box, that looks exactly like the craptastic Comcast DCT6412, but runs a TOTALLY different UI.

Just to make myself totally understood here, there is no way I could assemble a sentence, much less a paragraph, using the English Language to express the utter magical poopiness of the Comcast DVR Software. I hate it with the heat of a thousand suns. Rest assured it's garbage. it is slow, buggy, and has a dozen subtle and horrible bugs that are well documented around the net.

Fortunately the software included with the Verizon box is completly different, written from scratch and it's a joy. It's really beautiful. It's got high-color (24bit?) graphics, very polished and curvy, a distinct contrast to the low-color blocky Comcast software.

The interface is very intuitive, but also includes a number of advanced shortcuts that you'll stumble on in the using. For example, when watching TV, selecting up, down, left, or right on the direction button will take you (as a shortcut) to different modes instantly. For example, up takes you to a TV Guide split-screen with TV on the left, down takes you to a half-screen floating guide. Hitting Guide once takes you to a full-screen guide, pressing twice goes to split-screen. Hitting info once gives you a small popup, hitting it again takes you to a full-screen info page.


CIMG8060The DVR will hold about 17 hours of HD or 60 hours of SD TV (Standard Defintion) or whatever mix of both you can manage. As with most DVRs you can set each recording to be "protected" (not automatically deleted) or to stick around in a queue with the last x recordings. You can select new shows only, or all shows including repeats.


There's also a few "in progress" features like Widgets, that run on the DVR. Currently the software includes Traffic and Weather, and Notes is coming soon so you'll be able to leave notes for family members. It'd be nice if they did a calendar as well. I suppose it comes down to how far Verizon wants to push the envelope. I hope they are more progressive than Comcast has been. I'll be watching the version numbers closely to see when upgrades happen.

As of this writing my Comcast 6416-P2 is on Verizon's Release 1.0.4 Build 05.68. If yours is different, post it in the comments!  The set-top DVR software has been very stable so far, easy to use and my Harmony 880 remote required no reprogramming as the IR codes are the same for all Motorola DVRs.

CIMG8061  CIMG8062


When watching Recorded programs they are sorted by Date Descending. This is the one place the aesthetic of the fancy interface kind of gets in the way. You can only see about 12 shows at a time because of the generous whitespace of the interface design. Additionally (this is my #1 and really only major gripe) the interface doesn't automatically take up the complete width of a 16:9 widescreen television. I wonder (and wondered before with Comcast) if this is a limitation of the hardware that overlays the graphics. It'd be nice if these interfaces scaled wider, particularly the TV Guide.


High-Def, Standard Def and Picture Quality

Each show that is High-Definition has a little "HD" icon by them, and if you press left while in the Full Screen Guide you can filter all channels to show just High-Def channels. On Verizon TV all the channels (currently) between 800 and 899 are Hi-Def.

In my neighborhood that makes for 26 high-def channels, including all the major US networks. I have no way to measure the sharpness or compression of the channels, but I've personally got an eye for these things (and I'm really irritated by motion artifacts) so you can take that for what it's worth.

I feel like the High-Def Channels on Verizon are re-compressed less than they are on Comcast. Most (every?) provider has to re-encode channels to get them to fit within their bandwidth. I don't know if Verizon has more bandwidth than Comcast, but I can say that I had Comcast Cable for 10 years, the last 4 with High-Def and that Verizon's FIOs High-Def streams seem to have fewer artifacts when viewed on the same TV. This might also be as a result of newer software or hardware in the Motorola Set-Top box.

Certainly the software interface is much nicer to look at as I mentioned before, above. The fonts anti-alias nicer, and the whole interface seems to be designed for high-def more than the Comcast DVR.

The box will push out 480p, 720p or 1080i. There's no 1080p option, but there's also no 1080p source media, so that's fine. I'm running over HDMI and it works great, even through an HDMI switching receiver like my Onkyo.

One thing I noticed was that Standard Definition television, like Jon Stewart on Comedy Central looks MUCH clearer than Cable. Like, I literally said, "wow." There is NO ghosting. This is the first TV experience I've ever had in a my adult life without ghosting on some channel somewhere. That said, the feeds for Standard Definition channels seems slightly more "digital" or "blocky" than Cable. It's subtle, but it's there. You know you're at 640x480, especially on a larger TV. Phrased another way, if there was a "smoothing" setting, it's set to sharp on standard definition on Verizon FIOS, while it seemed "smooth" on Comcast Cable. Your mileage may vary.

On-Demand Movies

FIOS TV has only been available for a month or so in my state, and the On-Demand selection is meager at best, and doesn't yet include HD movies. I had HD movies on Comcast and was happy with both the quality and selection, so I imagine that FIOS will step up in the coming months.

 CIMG8058 CIMG8053

I am heartened, however, by the "AppleTV-like" interface of Movie Posters. It's very friendly and easily navigated. The WAF (Wife Acceptance Factor) will be high on this feature.

Choice and Variety

There are also a number of International Premium Channels available, including:

  • Vietnam's SBTN
  • CCTV-4 and CTI in Chinese
  • TV Japan
  • ART in Arabic
  • MBC in Korean
  • TV 5 in French
  • Rang A Rang in Farsi
  • RTN and Channel 1 in Russian
  • TV Asia

There's also almost 100 Spanish Language channels available if you like, and over 45 movie channels. Now, before you tease me about having too many channels, these are just available ones. You can set your favorites, and we've picked <10 and filter the list to show those.

FIOS also includes almost 100 Music-only Channels from Urge and Music Choice. The wife likes this over the radio because it shows the name of the artist and album.


The Core Package is currently only $43 a month, and you can get a number of different DVR options, picking between standard, HD, standard DVR and HD DVR. We were paying upwards of $60 with Comcast and we just don't watch THAT much TV to feel good about that much money. The Premium Channels like HBO and Showtime cost the same as they do on Cable, likely because those channels set their cost, not a TV provider like Verizon.


All in all, we've been VERY happy. The picture quality is great, the set-top box just works, and I have high hopes that Verizon will keep updating the boxes with new software and more On-Demand Movies. This is just the first month Verizon FIOS TV has been available in my state, and I feel they are off to a good start. Recommended over local cable if you can get it.

Related Posts

About Scott

Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. He is a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.

facebook twitter subscribe
About   Newsletter
Sponsored By
Hosting By
Dedicated Windows Server Hosting by SherWeb

Get namespaces from an XML Document with XPathDocument and LINQ to XML

January 17, '08 Comments [9] Posted in ASP.NET | LINQ | Programming | XML
Sponsored By

A fellow emailed me earlier asking how to get the namespaces from an XML document, but he was having trouble because the XML had some XML declarations like <?foo?>.

A System.Xml Way

XPathDocument has two cool methods, GetNamespace(localName) and GetNamespaceInScope, but they need a currentNode to work with.

 string s = @"<?mso-infoPathSolution blah=""blah""?>
              <?mso-application progid=""InfoPath.Document"" versionProgid=""InfoPath.Document.2""?>
              <my:ICS203 xml:lang=""en-US"" xmlns:xsi=""  
xmlns:xd=""""> <my:HeaderData/></my:ICS203>"; XPathDocument x = new XPathDocument(new StringReader(s)); XPathNavigator foo = x.CreateNavigator(); foo.MoveToFollowing(XPathNodeType.Element); IDictionary<string, string> whatever = foo.GetNamespacesInScope(XmlNamespaceScope.All);

Once you're on the right note, in this case the first element, you can call GetNamespacesInScope and get a nice dictionary that has what you need inside it.


I really like the System.Xml APIs, they make me happy.

A System.Xml + LINQ to XML Bridge Methods Way

How could we do this with the LINQ to XML namespace? Well, pretty much the same way with a much nicer first line (yes, this could be made smaller).

 XDocument y = XDocument.Parse(s);
 XPathNavigator poo = y.CreateNavigator();
 IDictionary<string, string> dude = foo.GetNamespacesInScope(XmlNamespaceScope.All);

Notice that the CreateNavigator hanging off of XDocument is actually an extension method that is there because we included the System.Xml.XPath namespace. There are a whole series of "bridge" methods that make moving between LINQ to XML APIs and System.Xml APIs seamless.


See the (extension) there in the tooltip? There's also a different icon for extension methods when they show up in Intellisense. See the small blue-arrow added next to CreateNavigator?


These helper methods are "spot-welded" on to existing object instances when you import a namespace that defines them. They are also called 'mixins.'

A Purely LINQ to XML Way

I also wanted to see how this could be done using LINQ to XML proper.

 Disclaimer: We are comparing Apples and Oranges here, so say, "wow that query is not as terse or compact as GetNamespacesInScope." We're comparing one layer of abstraction to a lower one. We could certainly make a mixin for XElements called GetNamespacesInScope and we'd be back where we started. The System.Xml method GetNamespacesInScope is hiding all the hard work.

Big thanks to Ion Vasilian for setting me straight with this LINQ to XML Query!

First we load the XML into an XDocument and ask for the attributes hanging off the root, but we just want namespace declarations.

XDocument z = XDocument.Parse(s);
var result = z.Root.Attributes().
        Where(a => a.IsNamespaceDeclaration).
        GroupBy(a => a.Name.Namespace == XNamespace.None ? String.Empty : a.Name.LocalName,
                a => XNamespace.Get(a.Value)).
        ToDictionary(g => g.Key, 
                     g => g.First());

Then we group them by namespace. Note the ternary operator ?: that returns "" for no namespace, else the namespaces local name as the key selector, and then gets an actual XNamespace.

Update: Ion wrote me and pointed out a mistake. I was calling z.Root.AncestorsAndSelf.Attributes, and I only needed to call z.Root.Attributes, or if I wanted to get all namespaces, z.Root.DescendantsAndSelf(). Thanks Ion!

Ion says: "z.Root.AncestorsAndSelf() says: from the root element of the document find all ancestors and the element itself. In other words only the root element. If you want to find the in-scope namespace declarations for a given element ‘e’, then on that element you’ll do e.AncestorsAndSelf(). In other words, starting from the given element ‘e’ walking up the ancestors path and including the element itself look for attributes that are namespace declarations and build a dictionary … Note that the question for in-scope namespace declarations is answered by walking up a path in the tree and not by doing a full traversal of the tree starting from a given point (a la e.DescendantsAndSelf())."

It can be confusing to figure out the various types of these variables like "a" and "g". In this example, "a" is an XAttribute because the call to Attributes() is of IEnumerable<XAttribute> and g is of type IGrouping<string, XNamespace>, gleaned from the expression inside of GroupBy().

We finish it off by taking the IGrouping and turning it into a dictionary with ToDictionary, selecting an appropriate key and the first At runtime "g" is an instance of System.Linq.Lookup<string, XNamespace>.Grouping which implements IGrouping, containing the namespace as an (and the only) element, subsequently retrieved with a call to First() and becomes the value side of the dictionary item.


Do also note one subtle detail. The System.Xml call to GetNamespacesInScope always includes the xmlns:xml namespace, declared implicitly. The LINQ query doesn't include this implicit namespace. Note also that these were sourced from XML Attributes and that the order of attributes is undefined (another way to say this is that attributes have no order.)

About Scott

Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. He is a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.

facebook twitter subscribe
About   Newsletter
Sponsored By
Hosting By
Dedicated Windows Server Hosting by SherWeb

Hanselminutes Podcast available on Zune

January 17, '08 Comments [7] Posted in ASP.NET | Microsoft | Podcast
Sponsored By

Finally, the Podcast is available in the Zune Marketplace. There's apparently a very long queue to get approved for the marketplace, so it's nice that it's finally done. We've increased the size of the logo graphic so it'll look optimal on players that support embedded hi-res cover art as well.

Click to subscribe to Hanselminutes with your Zune.

If you've got a Zune and/or the Zune Software installed on your machine you can subscribe with One Click with this link:

If you've got iTunes, you can subscribe with this link:

And if you're using a free Podcast downloader like FeedStation (and if not, why not?) then you can subscribe with the main URL:


About Scott

Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. He is a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.

facebook twitter subscribe
About   Newsletter
Sponsored By
Hosting By
Dedicated Windows Server Hosting by SherWeb

.NET Framework Library Source Code available for viewing

January 16, '08 Comments [15] Posted in ASP.NET | Learning .NET | Microsoft | Programming
Sponsored By

It's live and you can give it a try now! Ten minutes ago Shawn and Scott released the hounds. If you'd like to step through .NET Framework Source code, here's what you need to do.

  1. Install this QFE.
    • Note, if you're on 64-bit Windows, read the description as there is a single manual step for 64-bit folks like me.
  2. Go into Tools|Options|Debugging|General and turn off "Enable Just My Code" and turn on "Enable Source Server."
  3. Go to Symbols and add this URL and a local cache path. Make sure "search only when symbols are loaded manually" is checked.

That's it. Crazy. You can get more detail on Shawn's post if you need it. Here's me, just now, stepping into XPathNavigator's GetNamespacesInScope method.

Do note a few things.

  • Loading source the first time will be slow. There's lots of it. It'll be faster the second time.
  • If you can't right click and select Load Symbols from the Call Stack, try Ctrl-Alt-U and right click Load Symbols for the Module you want to step into.

ConsoleApplication1 (Debugging) - Microsoft Visual Studio (Administrator)

Fabulous. Enjoy.

Related Posts

About Scott

Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. He is a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.

facebook twitter subscribe
About   Newsletter
Sponsored By
Hosting By
Dedicated Windows Server Hosting by SherWeb

Long Term Viability of AppleTV

January 16, '08 Comments [50] Posted in Musings
Sponsored By

I just don't get AppleTV. I mean, I totally get it, I understand the intent, but I can do these things now, with either DVDs and Blockbuster Video or with my existing cable TV service. Certainly the seamlessness of the experience between iTunes, AppleTV and iPhone is a huge thing and amazing, but while iTunes and an iPod seem natural, AppleTV seems forced and stilted. I wonder if it'll really stick around for a number of years or if the studios look at it as "just another outlet."

On Demand Movies for $4 to $5

I've had the ability to rent movies on demand for YEARS on Comcast Cable, and they have had HD movies for two years. They aren't portable (see below) but certainly I can sit down and watch a movie instantly unless I'm too lazy to walk to the video store.

The Xbox360 also has On Demand movies in an almost identical way to the AppleTV, and the wife has started using that more and more. We watched "Hairspray" in HiDef and she was impressed with the experience. The benefit of course is that I already have an Xbox (as do 13 million other folks) and that it's a more versatile machine. It'd be cool if you could surf the web on an Apple TV and if it included a slot loading hi-def DVD player; that might make it more useful.

We find that a "DVD Total Access" pass is the best way for us to watch movies. We pay $20 and we get as many movies as we can turn around in the mail, which is usually ~6 a month or roughly $3 each. We can watch them anywhere, anytime, they don't expire or have late fees. I take them on planes and we watch half downstairs then take it upstairs to finish the last half. In this case, molecules are more portable than electrons for my family.

Take a Movie with You

It's a legal gray area, but I could also rip the rented CDs and watch them on my PSP or iPod, then delete them when I return the movie.

This, to me, is the #1 draw of the AppleTV. If you've got iPods and iPhones then being able to buy a movie in one place and watch it anywhere, even stopping at home and finishing on a plane. I can do this with DVDs that I get in the mail from Blockbuster, though, and they are excessively portable.

Storage For Your Own Content

Ripping and storing your own content to the AppleTV is the second most interesting feature I think, but that can be done with any NAS (Network Attached Storage) device and most any uPNP device, provided the codecs line up.

I kind of like having DVDs as storage, rather than the "psychic weight" of worrying about a hard drive crashing with 150 lovingly ripped DVDs sitting on it.

As the anonymous blogger at Shipping Seven says (caustically) about the lack of a DVD Drive on the new Macbook Air:

Dumping the DVD drive is a risky move. Yes, they are bulky, and are not used very much. But walk around any airplane/train, and you'll see a huge number of people with laptops watching movies.
Here's a hint, Apple: Not all those people are going to rent a movie off iTunes for a four-hour flight,
like you cheerfully propose. I can borrow a movie from my roommate's DVD collection. For free. For more than 24 hours. People generally pick the easiest and cheapest solution available to them.

It's true, folks like cheap; I like cheap.

Watch Photos on my TV

My TV, and many TVs, have an SD slot for photo slideshows, and the Xbox has both USB for docking a camera directly and uPNP, so this is interesting, but not incredibly so. If I could plug a digital camera directly into the AppleTV, that might be cool. (It has USB, can I do this now?)

Television Shows

Why would I want to pay $2 (TWO DOLLARS!) for a TV Show "the day after it airs" when I can watch it for free by visiting, or or any other Torrent site? And who wants to own a TV show. Why not 50 cents just to rent it? I'll wait until it comes out on DVD for those prices.

This is another example of where I think the Cable TV set-top boxes have advantage (today). For example, I get Showtime and I watch my favorite show, Dexter, on Showtime, but if I miss an episode, the entire season is sitting in the On Demand Menu for free. Why pay?


I really avoid buying gadgets unless they will fit into my, and my family's, lifestyle in a seamless and utilitarian way. The WAF (Wife Acceptance Factor) is about making everything "one button easy" like we have with the Harmony 880 Remote. When we moved to the new house I swapped out some equipment and we started using the Xbox as our primary DVD player. The wife was "shielded" from this because the Watch DVD button the Remote still worked as she expected.

I can see how an AppleTV could be a central part of one's media life, but I guess even though the Xbox is a totally different devices, perhaps, at least in my house, the Xbox has already taken its place as the "Box that does all things well."

Do you have an AppleTV and do you like it? Is this a gadget worth having? Is it indispensable like a GPS, MP3 Player or Tivo?

Related Posts

About Scott

Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. He is a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.

facebook twitter subscribe
About   Newsletter
Sponsored By
Hosting By
Dedicated Windows Server Hosting by SherWeb

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.