Scott Hanselman

Reading Documents on your Screen Effectively

May 24, '07 Comments [15] Posted in Musings
Sponsored By

I was at Fresh Thyme Soup earlier this week (fantastic place, seriously, go there, it's all made from scratch) and there was a guy surfing with their free wireless whose desktop looked basically like this (this is mine, for illustration.) He was actually running Ubuntu and running what looked like AbiWord, but that's not the point.

Why is a guy who's _______ (insert adjective here...perhaps "savvy?") enough to run Ubuntu reading a document with the window sized like this?

Seems like I'm forever doing this series of keystrokes in Word: Alt-V, then Z, then T, then Enter, to return Word to the Text Width Zoom level. Then I use Alt-V, then U, for Full Screen mode, especially when I'm forced to present a Word document via projector.

Is this the fundamental issue with a Windowing interface that lets you size things willy-nilly.

I've been using a MacBook Pro for two weeks now and I'm still, even now, never sure what I'm going to get when I press the little Green dot that I think of as "Maximize." Sometimes a window gets really tall, other times really wide. With the Finder, it's a roll of the dice.

Same thing with Windows, and Ubuntu. I'm FOREVER forced to rearrange things. There's got to be a middle place between Full-Screen/Maximized and Minimized that "knows" what I need. The fact that the "middle place" is currently "size it however you like" is starting to wear on me.

I'm not sure if the infinite possibilities of window resizing is more sad than the fact that anyone who has a 15" or larger screen wouldn't take the time to maximize their window for readability.

If you've got an LCD, for goodness sake:

  • If you've got bad eyes, make the icons large and the fonts large. Really. Don't run your monitor at 1024x768 if it supports 1900x1600. You're doing yourself and your a disservice. Turn on ClearType.

If I had a nickel for every time I went into an Executives office and had this conversation, I'd like like 65 cents. At least.

    • "Hm, you're running your laptop at non-native resolution..."
    • "I am?"
    • "Yes..." click, click, right-click, enter, boom.
    • "Oh, wow, that is clearer. But the icons are small now"
    • "Ok. One sec" click, click, Large Icons, boom.
    • "Ah, that's nice. That text is kind of jagged."
    • "Ok. One sec" click, click, ClearType, boom.
    • "Wow, that's like getting new glasses."
    • "Yes. Yes, it is."

Make your pixels work for you, Dear Reader.

About Scott

Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. He is a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.

facebook twitter subscribe
About   Newsletter
Sponsored By
Hosting By
Dedicated Windows Server Hosting by SherWeb
Thursday, May 24, 2007 12:14:43 AM UTC
Just an observation.

Many (many, many) Windows programs do not scale appropriately when you up the font size. For that reason, I switched my Dad's monitor to non-native resolution. Some programs literally became unusable.

Arguably the problem is with the application developers, not the system. But the end result is the same.
Thursday, May 24, 2007 2:44:00 AM UTC
It may sound like a lame plug, but I was curious to know if you tried slimKEYS (specifically the slimSIZE plug-in) to help you resize and move windows like you want? I made this app primarily for friends and myself with dual or wide-screen monitors. It does not address how an application reacts to being resized, but does help you apply resizing quickly.
Thursday, May 24, 2007 2:47:43 AM UTC
Hm...I use ultramon to move things around, but I'll give slimsize a more focused try.
Thursday, May 24, 2007 3:54:53 AM UTC
The answer is wmill. Tiled windows, wasting no space. Set up custom keyboard shortcuts so that you can move between windows. Set up custom workspaces tailored exactly to your desires. For a programmer, there is nothing better.

Linux only, of course. It's the only reason I miss Linux. (I used ion3, but this seems to be the successor to it).
Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:04:42 AM UTC
Oh, and I'm really not trying to be a jerk, but Microsoft's patent on clearType hobbles the Linux freetype library.
Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:15:21 AM UTC
iTunes has a nifty (and relatively unknown) feature that resizes the window based on what it thinks suits your screen best. Hold down the shift button while double-clicking on the title bar and you'll see what I mean. I love using this feature.
Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:43:30 AM UTC
Get The Wonderful Icon. You can make keyboard shortcuts for window resizing, relocating, resize *and* relocating, text macros, or damn near anything else. You can even tell it to override window unresizability and such.

http://www.thewonderfulicon.com

Steve Sandvik
Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:45:43 AM UTC
@BillMill, I'm with you on this Patent B.S. - I understand why a company would want a patent or two to protect hard-earned Intellectual Property, but not EVERYTHING, and not OBVIOUS stuff. Is this app a "Wmii for Windows" equivalent: http://www.windowsizer.com ?

@Stuart - I'll check it out, thanks!
Thursday, May 24, 2007 10:38:01 AM UTC
Scott, check out AllSnap. It makes window edges snap to screen edges and other window edges, when you are resizing / arranging. Seriously useful.
Damian
Thursday, May 24, 2007 1:49:50 PM UTC
Thanks for the info. I am test driving ClearType and Large icons after your recommendation. I have been feeling like I am going blind, so I am hoping this helps.
Thursday, May 24, 2007 1:56:47 PM UTC
@Scott: I'm going to check that out, interesting link.

What I think I'll miss is customizable keyboard shortcuts. In ion3, I would have Vim covering the left side of the window, then two terminals on the right set to ctrl-1 and ctrl-2. Because vim was on the left, there was a keyboard shortcut to move to the left that always got me there. This way, I didn't have to alt-tab through windows, I could learn commands to go exactly where I wanted to.

But! Something is better than nothing.

Also, I meant wmii, not wmill, but username sequences are hardwired into my hands.
Thursday, May 24, 2007 2:49:39 PM UTC
"even now, never sure what I'm going to get when I press the little Green dot that I think of as "Maximize." Sometimes a window gets really tall, other times really wide. With the Finder, it's a roll of the dice."

Not the point of this post but...

The "maximize" button resizes the window based on the contents of the window to the best fit for the screen size. Basically, it tried to get rid of any vertical or horizontal scrollbars that it can. Long documents get taller, wide documents get wider. So to a certain extent you can guess what you're size you're going to get. Try this, open a PDF using Preview (side note: Why can't Windows have a PDF viewer built in that works as well as Preview and can tell Adobe Reader to shove off if it gets installed?) Then zoom in a click or two, the hit the green button. Open the drawer in Preview and hit the green button again. It's a little hard to get used to when you've had nothing but the "Restore" button for years. Sometimes the "restore down" button makes my windows larger than the screen size?!

As for Finder. Finder sucks. It needs a re-vamp badly. If Leopard doesn't include a new Finder, expect a LOT of posts from Apple fans decrying that fact.
Thursday, May 24, 2007 5:56:10 PM UTC
What I really annoys me in windows (Vista too) is the CHM reader. I can't get the font bigger. I use lower resolution in this case.
Ivaylo Bratoev
Thursday, May 24, 2007 7:43:22 PM UTC
Scott,

The bottom line is that there is an optimum line width for any type size. If you size the text too wide your eyes can become fatigued when moving from the end of one line to the beginning of the net. David Seigel's Web Wonk used to expalin this very well. However, it doesn't appear to be on his site any more.

Now, if your wondering why he didn't maximize an enlarge the font, I don't know. Perhaps he didn't want people at the next table reading his document. Not that anybody would look at someone elses computer.

Bob
Bob Archer
Monday, May 28, 2007 4:24:35 AM UTC
One thing that bugs me is developers who configure their IDE to have so much eye candy that there's very little left for the actual code. Why buy a big monitor just to cover it with dross? Other applications have the same (dis)ability - view and dock all the toolbars in older versions of MS-Word, for instance. But why anyone would bother doing that I have no idea. I do the opposite - turn off stuff so I can see more of the primary pane.
Moz
Comments are closed.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.