Scott Hanselman

Scott Hanselman: Developer Productivity Tools Video Part 2

July 18, 2006 Comment on this post [4] Posted in Reviews | PowerShell | XmlSerializer | TechEd | Speaking | Web Services | Tools
Sponsored By

Wroxvideo2When I was at TechEd I visited the Beantown.net INETA User Group and gave a (fairly ad-hoc) talk on Developer Productivity Tools. Jim Minatel loaned me his microphone and a copy of Camtasia and we recorded the talk. Thanks Jim!

It was a great crowd, a lot of fun. We had a number of "off the cuff" discussions about random stuff so I hope it doesn't take away from the gist of the talk.

The complete presentation was around 1 hour 45 minutes, so for online, Jim has split it into 4 segments. This week's segment is #2 and is available now and is about 20 minutes long. If you watch it in your browser, I recommend you double click on Windows Media Player to make the video go full screen. You can also download the full video.

It covers:

  • 00:00 Title
  • 00:15 Scott's introduction (repeated from the first video segment)
  • 00:40 XmlSerializer
  • 8:40 Interlude: SlickRun and Google
  • 9:10 Back to XmlSerializer
  • 10:40 SlickRun
  • 12:20 Explorer2 and Launching apps with Google Desktop Search
  • 13:20 Far - A Windows application like DOS Norton Commander
  • 14:35 Why Scott has so much stuff on his desktop
  • 16:40 Junctions and reparse points
  • 19:30 Closing credits

The remaining two segments for following weeks will cover roughly:

  • Week 3: Windows PowerShell - 33 minutes
  • Week 4: Active Words, Code Rush, SOAP Scope, XML doc viewer - 23 minutes

Here's a few notes about the video quality from Jim:

1. Why can't I fast forward or skip ahead through the video while it's streaming? Answer: We're running these off of a standard IIS server, not a Windows Media Server. IIS supports streaming, but not indexed playback during streaming to allow skipping ahead. If you want to do that, just download the whole video and all of the forwarding and timeline controls will be available in Windows Media Player.

2. Why isn't the video quality better? Is Camtasia to blame? No, Camtasia rocks. The raw videos I'm getting in Camtasia format are 100% clear, as if you were looking right at the presenter's monitor. The problem I've discovered is with the Windows Media Encoder. It just isn't well suited to on-screen presentation videos like this. The blurring and color blotching seems worst in Scott Hanselman's videos and I think I know why. When I watch the raw presentation, he's flying back and forth between open windows, background tools that pop up, and his desktop. It's just faster switching between very varied images than the encoder can seem to keep up with. I've twidled all the settings and got the best I can for now without doubling or tripling the file sizes. The other option would be to post an alternate version in Camtasia format and a link to download their playback codec [Scott: or a large FLV]. Because WMV is universal for my .NET developer audience, that has to be my common choice though.

There's also some other good screencasts up at Wrox. The growing list of videos is available at wrox.com. The first few videos in the series are:

I hope you enjoy them.

About Scott

Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. He is a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.

facebook bluesky subscribe
About   Newsletter
Hosting By
Hosted on Linux using .NET in an Azure App Service

Portland Code Camp 2006 contracts and expands

July 18, 2006 Comment on this post [6] Posted in PowerShell | ASP.NET | Ruby | Speaking | Subversion | Web Services | Gaming
Sponsored By

CodeCamp has contracted to a single day, Saturday July 22nd, which should work nicely for folks who thought about going but didn't want to give up their weekend. However, the agenda is almost baked and it's looking amazing.

We've also got TWO Xbox 360s to give away. Two.

Additionally, in the evening at 5pm, there's a big BBQ Dinner and Party featuring the live music of rock/punk/funk/nerd band Mars Retrieval Unit. There's also a Frisbee Golf course! How could you NOT register for CodeCamp today

Check out this list of luminous folks from the NW who are speaking at CodeCamp this weekend! Register for FREE here.

CodeCamp 2006 Final Agenda

8:00am to 8:30am Registration
8:40am to 9:00am Opening Session
9:15am to 10:30am ASP.NET Architecture: Core ASP.NET
Rick Strahl
All
The .NET Compact Framework - An Introduction
Rory Blyth
Intermediate
Introduction to Ruby on Rails
Lucas Carlson
All
Mono for Cross-Platform .NET Development
Patrick Reilly
Beginner
.NET Refactoring
Wayne Allen
Intermediate
Automated Regression Hunts
Janis Johnson
All
Introducing Windows Workflow Foundation
Paul Mehner
Intermediate
PowerShell - A New Shell for a New Century
Scott Hanselman
All
10:45am to 12:15pm Using AJAX with ASP.NET
Ben Strackany
Intermediate
Diving Deeper: Windows Mobile and Data Access
Rory Blyth
Intermediate
An Exercise in Meta-Programming with Rails
Lucas Carlson
Intermediate
.NET Coding Standards & Best Practices
David McCarter
All
Web Testing with Team System
Jeff Levinson
All
End to End Automated Build Process
William Howell
Intermediate
Windows Workflow Foundation: Building Workflows
Manoj Agarwal
Intermediate
Web Service Software Factory Unleashed!
Chris Tavares
All
12:15pm to 1:15pm Lunch (provided)
1:15pm to 2:30pm Dealing with Long Running Requests in ASP.NET
Rick Strahl
All
Distributed File Sys via Steganography in VB.NET
Howard Hoy
Intermediate
IronRuby
Wilco Bauwer
Advanced
Adding a Plugin to Eclipse: Windows and Linux
Ted Kubaska
Beginner
Test Driven Development with Team System
Jeff Levinson
All
Better Requirements Definition with Use Cases
Ashu Potnis
All
XSLT You Can Use
Stuart Celarier
Beginner
Amazon's Simple Storage Service
Mike Culver
Intermediate
2:45pm to 4:00pm Using Cross-Domain AJAX Today
Lucas Carlson
Intermediate
Poker Bots for Fun and Profit!
Jeff Berkowitz
All
Unlock the Power of the WMI!
David McCarter
All
Practical Tips for the ASP.NET Developer
Walt Ritscher
Intermediate
Understanding Subversion
Stuart Celarier
Beginner
Dependency Injections for Healthier Unit Tests
Malcolm Anderson
Beginner
An Introduction to WCF for the Complete Beginner
Rory Blyth
Intermediate
Build an InfoPath/Web Services Solution
Don Shults
Intermediate
4:15pm to 5:30pm Taking ATLAS for a Ride
Rick Strahl
All
Game Maker for Kids (or just the kid in you)
Chris Brooks
Beginner
Atom, HTTP, and XMPP
Patrick Logan
Intermediate
Creating SQL Server Database Objects in .NET
Rob Boek
All
Team Edition for Database Professionals
Jeff Levinson
All
CodePlex - Online Open Source Development
Jonathan Wanagel
All
DotNetNuke Explored
Kelly White
Intermediate
Tell me your Distributed App Cares and Woes
Chris Sells
All
5:30pm to 9:30pm Barbeque Dinner and Camp Fiesta
live music - prizes, giveaways, and contests - folf tournament - lawn sports

 

About Scott

Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. He is a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.

facebook bluesky subscribe
About   Newsletter
Hosting By
Hosted on Linux using .NET in an Azure App Service

ScriptBlock and Runspace Remoting in PowerShell

July 15, 2006 Comment on this post [2] Posted in PowerShell | XmlSerializer | Web Services | Bugs
Sponsored By

When I first saw grokked PowerShell I wanted to be able to issue commands remotely. There's some great stuff going on with PowerShellRemoting over at GotDotNet, but that's remoting of the User Interface.

I want to be able to issue commands to many different machines in a distributed fashion.

After some pair programming with Brian Windheim, we set up a Windows Service that would get a string of commands and return a string that was the output o those commands. I could then issue remote commands, but the result at the client was just strings. I was in PowerShell but I'd just made the equivalent of PSEXEC for PowerShell...so basically I'd gotten nowhere.

Ideally I'd like to have behavior like this (but I don't):

using (Runspace myRunSpace = RunspaceFactory.CreateRunspace("COMPUTERNAME"))

{

    myRunSpace.Open();
}

But a Runspace is local and inproc. I don't see a really obvious and straightforward way to do this, considering that there's LOTS of internal and private stuff going on within PowerShell.

I liked that the string in, string out remoting stuff worked fine, but really I want to get Objects back from the remote machine. So, I started using Reflection to poke around inside System.Management.Automation.Serializer, but that got evil quickly. Truly evil.

Then I had an epiphany and remember the Export-CliXml cmdlet. It is the public cmdlet that uses the serializer I was trying to get to. It isn't the XmlSerializer. It's a serialized graph of objects with a rich enough description of those objects that the client doesn't necessarily need the CLR types. If reflection had a serialization format, it might look like this format.

Now, if I take the commands I was issuing to the remote "invoker" and export the result of the pipeline to this function XML format, I've just discovered my remoting server's wire format.

This RunspaceInvoker type is hosted in a Windows Service, but it could be in any Remoting hosting process. I'll likely move it inside IIS for security reasons. The app.config for my service looks like this:

<?xml version="1.0"  encoding="utf-8" ?>

<configuration xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/.NetConfiguration/v2.0">

  <system.runtime.remoting>

    <customErrors mode="Off"/>

    <application>

      <channels>

        <channel ref="http" port="8081"/>

      </channels>

      <service>

        <wellknown mode="SingleCall"

                   type="Hanselman.RemoteRunspace.RunspaceInvoker,
                   Hanselman.RemoteRunspace
" objectUri="remoterunspace.rem"/>

      </service>

    </application>

  </system.runtime.remoting>

</configuration>

Note the objectUri and port. We'll need those in a second. There's an installer class that I run using installutil.exe. I set the identity of the Windows Service and it starts up with net start RemoteRunspaceService.

This is the RunspaceInvoker (not the best name):

 public class RunspaceInvoker : MarshalByRefObject

 {

    public RunspaceInvoker(){}

 

    public string InvokeScriptBlock(string scriptString)

    {

        using (Runspace myRunSpace = RunspaceFactory.CreateRunspace())

        {

            myRunSpace.Open();

 

            string tempFileName = System.IO.Path.GetTempFileName();

            string newCommand = scriptString +
                " | export-clixml " + "\"" + tempFileName + "\"";

            Pipeline cmd = myRunSpace.CreatePipeline(newCommand);

 

            Collection<PSObject> objectRetVal = cmd.Invoke();

 

            myRunSpace.Close();

 

            string retVal = System.IO.File.ReadAllText(tempFileName);

            System.IO.File.Delete(tempFileName);

            return retVal;

        }

    }

 }

A command for the remote service comes into the scriptString parameter. For example we might pass in dir c:\temp as the string, or a whole long pipeline. We create a Runspace, open it and append "| export-clixml" and put the results in a tempFileName.

THOUGHT: It's a bummer I can't put the results in a variable or get it out of the Pipeline, but I think I understand why they force me to write the CLI-XML to a file. They are smuggling the information out of the system. It's the Heisenberg Uncertainly Principle of PowerShell. If you observe something, you change it. Writing the results to a file is a trapdoor that doesn't affect the output of the pipeline. I could be wrong though.

Anyway, this doesn't need to be performant. I write it to a temp file, read the file in and delete it right away away. Then I return the serialized CLI-XML to the caller.The client portion is two parts. I probably should make a custom cmdlet, but I didn't really see a need. Perhaps someone can offer me a reason why.

For simplicity I first made this RunspaceProxy. Remember, this is the class that the client uses to invoke the command remotely.

    public class RunspaceProxy

    {

        public RunspaceProxy()

        {

            HttpChannel chan = new HttpChannel();

            if (ChannelServices.GetChannel("http") != null)

            {

                ChannelServices.RegisterChannel(chan, false);

            }

        }

 

        public Collection<PSObject> Execute(string command, string remoteurl)

        {

            RunspaceInvoker proxy = (RunspaceInvoker)Activator.GetObject(
                   typeof(RunspaceInvoker), remoteurl);

            string stringRetVal = proxy.InvokeScriptBlock(command);

 

            using (Runspace myRunSpace = RunspaceFactory.CreateRunspace())

            {

                myRunSpace.Open();

                string tempFileName = System.IO.Path.GetTempFileName();

                System.IO.File.WriteAllText(tempFileName, stringRetVal);

                Pipeline cmd = myRunSpace.CreatePipeline(
                    "import-clixml " + "\"" + tempFileName + "\"");

                Collection<PSObject> retVal = cmd.Invoke();

                System.IO.File.Delete(tempFileName);

                return retVal;

            }

        }

    }

I'm using the HTTP channel for debugging and ease of use with TcpTrace. The command to be executed comes in along with the remoteUrl. We make a RunspaceInvoker (the class we talked about a second ago) on the remote machine and it does the work via a call to InvokeScriptBlock. The CLI-XML comes back over the wire and now I have to make a tempfile on the client. Then, in order to 'deserialize' - a better word would be re-hydrate - the Collection of PSObjects, I make a local Runspace and call import-clixml and poof, a Collection<PSObject> is returned to the client. I delete the file immediately.

Why is returning real PSObjects so important when I had strings working? Because now I can select, sort, and where my way around these PSObjects as if they were local - because they are. They are real and substantial. This will allow us to write scripts that blur the line between the local admin and remote admin.

Now, all this has been C# so far, when does the PowerShell come in? Also, since I've worked so hard (well, not that hard) to get the return values integrated cleanly with PowerShell, what's a good way to get the remote calling of scripts integrated cleanly?

My first try I made a function RemoteInvoke() that took a command string. It worked, but felt tacky. Then I remembered how Jeffrey Snover said to look to Type Extensions when adding functionality rather than functions and cmdlets.

I made a My.Types.ps1xml file in my PSConfiguration directory and put this in it:

<Types>

  <Type>

    <Name>System.Management.Automation.ScriptBlock</Name>

    <Members>

      <ScriptMethod>

        <Name>RemoteInvoke</Name>

        <Script>

          if ($GLOBAL:remoteUrl -eq $null) { throw 'Set $GLOBAL:remoteUrl first!' }


          [System.reflection.assembly]::LoadWithPartialName("System.Runtime.Remoting") |
               out-null

          $someDll = "C:\foo\Hanselman.RemoteRunspace.dll"

          $asm = [System.Reflection.Assembly]::LoadFrom($someDll) | out-null


          $runspace = new-object Hanselman.RemoteRunspace.RunspaceProxy


          $runspace.Execute([string]$this, $GLOBAL:remoteUrl);

        </Script>

      </ScriptMethod>

    </Members>

  </Type>

</Types>

Then called Update-TypeData My.Types.ps1xml (actually it's in my profile so it happens automatically.)  This file adds a new method to the ScriptBlock type. A ScriptBlock is literally a block of script. It's a very natural "atom" for us to use.

NOTE: I'd like to have the RemoteUrl be a parameter to the RemoteInvoke ScriptMethod, but I can't fine really any documentation on this. I'll update it when I figure it out, but for now it uses a $GLOBAL variable and freaks out if it's not set.

The RemoteInvoke loads the .NET System.Runtime.Remoting assembly, then it loads our Proxy assembly. Then it calls Execute, casting the [ScriptBlock] to a [string] because the Runspace takes a string.

For example, at a PowerShell prompt if I do this:

PS[79] C:\> $remoteUrl="http://remotecomputer:8081/RemoteRunspace.rem"

PS[80] C:\PS[80] C:\> 2+2
4

PS[81] C:\> (2+2).GetType()

IsPublic IsSerial Name                                     BaseType
-------- -------- ----                                     --------
True     True     Int32                                    System.ValueType

PS[82] C:\> {2+2}.GetType()

IsPublic IsSerial Name                                     BaseType
-------- -------- ----                                     --------
True     False    ScriptBlock                              System.Object

PS[83] C:\> {2+2}
4

PS[84] C:\> {2+2}.RemoteInvoke()
4

PS[85] C:\>
{2+2}.RemoteInvoke().GetType()

IsPublic IsSerial Name                                     BaseType
-------- -------- ----                                     --------
True     True     Int32                                    System.ValueType

Note the result of the last line. The value that comes out of RemoteInvoke is an Int32, not a string. The result of that ScriptBlock executing is a PowerShell type that I can work with elsewhere in my local script.

Here's the CLI-XML that went over the wire (just to make it clear it's not XmlSerializer XML):

<Objs Version="1.1" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/powershell/2004/04">

  <I32>4</I32>

</Objs>

This 2+2 stuff is a terse and simple example, but this technique works with even large and complex object graphs like the FileInfos and FileSystemInfo objects that are returned from dir (get-childitem).

Remoterunspace

In this screenshot we do a get-process on the remote machine then sort and filter the results just as we would/could if the call were local.

My WishList for the Next Version of PowerShell

  • All this stuff I did, built in already with security and wonderfulness.
  • All the stuff in PowerShellRemoting, with security and wonderfulness.
  • Some kind of editor or schema installed in VS.NET for editing My.Types.ps1xml.
  • TabExpansion for all Types in the current AppDomain (this of course, already done by MonadBlog and MOW).

Thanks again to Brian Windheim for the peer programming today that jump started this!

About Scott

Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. He is a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.

facebook bluesky subscribe
About   Newsletter
Hosting By
Hosted on Linux using .NET in an Azure App Service

Do I sleep?

July 14, 2006 Comment on this post [10] Posted in Musings
Sponsored By

Strangely today two separate (and presumably unrelated) bloggers questioned whether or not I sleep. David Suruyange posted on it and Ryan Rinaldi did also, albeit in passing.

However, I must say, I do have quite a fondness for Nancy Kress' Beggars in Spain (Wikipedia).

"The book deals with the issues of genetic modification to unborn babies and problems that may arrive within society from such technologies. Specifically, the book examines a genetic modification that renders the babies capable of never having to sleep. This allows the babies, as they grow, the chance to accomplish much more with their freed up time as well as a collection of secondary genetic traits. The books charts the reactions of society to the 'Sleepless' from the viewpoint of the 'Sleepless' group as they struggle to find a place in society and battle against the prejudices they face.

The book's protagonist, Leisha Camden, is a sleepless person who comes from an extremely rich family and whose life is paralleled and compared to that of her twin who is born without the genetic modification for sleeplessness."

One sure could get a lot done if they didn't sleep. Do you sleep?


In other news, Scott Bellware (my personal Evil Spock) has proceeded to register Hanselmetric.com and is (very likely) proceding to build a (top secret) Froogle search populated entirely by things I've got in my house. Here is his exceedingly thoughful business strategy:

"What the world needs now is love sweet love, and a website that aggregates the Hanselman product testimonials scattered around all the various websites so that we can plan our future purchases accordingly.  Googling "scott hanselman testimonial" simply isn't accurate enough when arriving up the end of the month with a couple extra bucks in my pocket and a burning desire to spend .  Dammit, I want to know what other products satisfy the Hanselmetric that I haven't been made aware of, and until I do, I just feel sort of empty inside.  The Hanselmetric represents the pinnacle of an aspect of contemporary cultural evolution, and I just don't want to be left behind."

Madness! Hm...maybe we can make some kind of cooperative crossover affiliate work. Let's focus first on getting me on Oprah. Or at least some kind of local cable network or QVC. Give me a call ScottB! ;)

About Scott

Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. He is a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.

facebook bluesky subscribe
About   Newsletter
Hosting By
Hosted on Linux using .NET in an Azure App Service

A new day, two new browsers compared - Firefox 2.0 Beta 1 and IE 7.0 Beta 3

July 14, 2006 Comment on this post [18] Posted in XML | HttpHandler | Bugs | Tools
Sponsored By

Like a schmuck, I can't resist installing beta software, especially REALLY beta software, especially on computers that I really shouldn't be installing beta software on like my computer or my wife's, especially at 2am. After some painful installation chaos/debugging...I got Firefox 2.0 Beta 1 and IE 7.0 Beta 3 installed. Here's my thoughts.

First Impressions:

Firefox 2.0 Beta 1: Still ugly as hell by default. For crying out loud, just make up with the Qute guy and set his theme by default. Sheesh.

IE 7: Different, softer, minimalist. I like the tabs. It's odd, but feels familiar.

RSS

Recall that IE7 installs the new Windows RSS Platform with it's Common Feed List that 90% of Windows Aggregators will start using for storage. Since Firefox doesn't have a Common Feed Store and doesn't recognize the new Windows Common Feed Store (until someone writes a utility to register feed:// with the Common Feed List) it displays a list of registered feed readers on your system. I really like this approach as it works with my FeedDemon addiction, and will work with not only offline aggregators like RSSBandit and SharpReader, but online ones like Bloglines and MyYahoo.

Both browsers show a very nice, styled page rather than the underlying RSS/XML. IE uses heuristics to figure out if it's a feed and also handles lots of malform-edness, while AFAIK Firefox goes by mime/type.

IerssFirefoxrss

In IE, since it includes a feed retrieval engine, there's a number of very nicely designed dialogs for updating the schedules for each feed, as well as their attached (enclosed) files.

Ierss2

Anti-Phishing

The need for a browser to have Anti-Phishing capabilities is huge in my opinion. Comparing Firefox 2.0 Beta 1 with IE 7.0 Beta 3, I visited six brand new, known, phishing sites. (Remember, Corillian knows Anti-Phishing)

Interestingly, and surprisingly to me, only IE detected every single phishing site. Firefox didn't detect a single one. I would point out also, as an aside, that Outlook 2007 went to great lengths to keep me from visiting these sites.

Perhaps the phishing services that Firefox uses at Google were down during my test? When Firefox does detect a phishing site it's supposed to look like this, below. I was hoping to have two identical phishing sites side by side, but again, Firefox didn't detect anything suspicious on these sites, so I visited the Firefox test phishing site. You can also submit naughty sites to Google.

IE7 showing a suspicious websiteFirefox showing a suspicious website

One interesting note, both browsers allowed me to continue working with the known phishing site, even though they knew they were dangerous. I think I'd rather have a dialog that made me type in "I know this is a phishing site."

Usability

IE7 has a new "tile" feature available by default; it's the little 4-square button to the far left of the tabs. It's "exposé" for web pages. There's a number of similar Firefox extensions like Foxpose and Tabexpose, but none for Firefox 2.0 today. Give it a few hours. Interesting that IE7 includes it by default, though, with Ctrl-Q (QuickTabs) as the hotkey.

The little "star" non-committal icon aims to say "click me, it'll make sense soon." This opens a the Favorites|Feeds|History pane. Eh.

IE7 with four sites open, tiledIE7 with History Pane open

In IE7, I love that CTRL-Scroll is how mapped to the new (and WAY more useful) zoom feature (ala Opera 1997), although I was disappointed to see that the useless Text Size Feature is next to it. Breeds confusion I say. Screw you, Text Size and your lies.

Iezoom

There's dozens of other usability things in IE7 that are obvious, including the revamped Tools|Options for Humans, which I wouldn't be afraid to send my Dad into. Except for Tools|Options|Advanced - that's still scary even to me.

In Firefox 2.0, less has changed, at least, less dramatic stuff. The coolest new feature, IMHO, is the inline spell checker.

Firefoxspellcheck

There's another new feature called micro-summaries. Basically it's your page's opportunity to change the title of a bookmark to provide status. For example, Woot provides a micro-summary by specifying this in their HTML:

 <link rel="microsummary" type="application/x.microsummary+xml" href="DefaultMicrosummary.ashx" />

That HttpHandler might responsd with just this: "$69.99 : Nexxtech 7” 16:9 LCD Portable DVD Player" as text/plain. That text could then be used as the title of a bookmark or toolbar button. It's a little early, and very specilized, but it fills a small gap and adds on to the whole link rel="" vibe nicely. Could really take off ono mobile devices as the equivalent of "tiny RSS."

Firefox also includes the trappings of client-side session support that could take AJAX apps to the next level in the next few years if Microsoft jumps on board also.

Downloads

The download windows of each browser look pretty much the same.

Iedownload

There's a new animation in IE's, but otherwise, not much here. I still prefer Firefox's consolidated view.

Firefoxdownload

Conclusion

Before I was pretty much a one browser guy, Firefox. Now I think I'll try IE more, and even more likely I'll notice which browser I'm in less as they are converging. The RSS features of IE7 are compelling and as soon as there's a NewsGator Online/RSS Common Feed Store synchronization story along with FeedDemon support, I might spend more time in IE7.

Most importantly I won't feel back recommending either of these browsers to family. Both are WAY safer than their predecessors. (Assuming the future parity of their phishing feature)

About Scott

Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. He is a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.

facebook bluesky subscribe
About   Newsletter
Hosting By
Hosted on Linux using .NET in an Azure App Service

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.