Scott Hanselman

CDNs fail, but your scripts don't have to - fallback from CDN to local jQuery

April 30, '13 Comments [41] Posted in ASP.NET | Javascript
Sponsored By

CDN issues in the Northeast

There's a great website called http://whoownsmyavailability.com that serves as a reminder to me (and all of us) that external dependencies are, in fact, external. As such, they are calculated risks with tradeoffs. CDNs are great, but for those minutes or hours that they go down a year, they can be super annoying.

I saw a tweet today declaring that the ASP.NET Content Delivery Network was down. I don't work for the CDN team but I care about this stuff (too much, according to my last performance review) so I turned twitter to figure this out and help diagnose it. The CDN didn't look down from my vantage point.

I searched for things like "ajax cdn,"microsoft cdn," and "asp.net cdn down" and looked at the locations reported by the Twitter users in their profiles. They had locations like CT, VT, DE, NY, ME. These are all abbreviations for states in the northeast of the US. There were also a few tweets from Toronto and Montreal. Then, there was one random tweet from a guy in Los Angeles on the other side of the country. LA doesn't match the pattern that was developing.

I tweeted LA guy and asked him if he was really in LA or rather on the east coast.

Bingo. He was VPN'ed into Massachusetts (MA). I had a few folks send me tracerts and sent them off to the CDN team who fixed the issue in a few minutes. There was apparently a bad machine in Boston/NYC area that had a configuration change specific to the a certain Ajax path that had gone undetected by their dashboard (this has been fixed and only affected the Ajax part of the CDN in this local area).

More importantly, how can we as application developers fallback gracefully when an external dependency like a CDN goes down? Just last week I moved all of my Hanselminutes Podcast images over to a CDN. If there was a major issue I could fall back to local images with a code change. However, if this was a mission critical site, I should not only have a simple configuration switch to fallback to local resources, but I should also test and simulate a CDN going down so I'm prepared when it inevitably happens.

With JavaScript we can detect when our CDN-hosted JavaScript resources like jQuery or jQuery UI aren't loaded successfully and try again to load them from local locations.

Falling back from CDN to local copies of jQuery and JavaScript

The basic idea for CDN fallback is to check for a type or variable that should be present after a script load, and if it's not there, try getting that script locally. Note the important escape characters within the document.write. Here's jQuery:

<script src="http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jquery/jquery-2.0.0.min.js"></script>
<script>
if (typeof jQuery == 'undefined') {
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='/js/jquery-2.0.0.min.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
}
</script>

Or, slightly differently. This example uses protocol-less URLS, checks a different way and escapes the document.write differently.

<script src="//ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jquery/jquery-2.0.0.min.js"></script>
<script>window.jQuery || document.write('<script src="js/jquery-2.0.0.min.js">\x3C/script>')</script>

If you are loading other plugins you'll want to check for other things like the presence of specific functions added by your 3rd party library, as in "if (type of $.foo)" for jQuery plugins.

Some folks use a JavaScript loader like yepnope. In this example you check for jQuery as the complete (loading) event fires:

yepnope([{
load: 'http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jquery/jquery-2.0.0.min.js',
complete: function () {
if (!window.jQuery) {
yepnope('js/jquery-2.0.0.min.js');
}
}
}]);

Even better, RequireJS has a really cool shorthand for fallback URLs which makes me smile:

requirejs.config({
enforceDefine: true,
paths: {
jquery: [
'//ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jquery/jquery-2.0.0.min',
//If the CDN location fails, load from this location
'js/jquery-2.0.0.min'
]
}
});

//Later
require(['jquery'], function ($) {
});

With RequireJS you can then setup dependencies between modules as well and it will take care of the details. Also check out this video on Using Require.JS in an ASP.NET MVC application with Jonathan Creamer.

Updated ASP.NET Web Forms 4.5 falls back from CDN automatically

For ASP.NET Web Forms developers, I'll bet you didn't know this little gem. Here's another good reason to move your ASP.NET sites to ASP.NET 4.5 - using a CDN and falling back to local files is built into the framework.

(We've got this for ASP.NET MVC also, keep reading!)

Fire up Visual Studio 2012 and make a new ASP.NET 4.5 Web Forms application.

When using a ScriptManager control in Web Forms, you can set EnableCdn="true" and ASP.NET will automatically change the <script> tags from using local scripts to using CDN-served scripts with local fallback checks included. Therefore, this ASP.NET WebForms ScriptManager:

<asp:ScriptManager runat="server" EnableCdn="true">
<Scripts>
<asp:ScriptReference Name="jquery" />
<asp:ScriptReference Name="jquery.ui.combined" />
</Scripts>
</asp:ScriptManager>

...will output script tags that automatically use the CDN and automatically includes local fallback.

<script src="http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jQuery/jquery-1.8.2.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
//<![CDATA[
(window.jQuery)||document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="Scripts/jquery-1.8.2.js"><\/script>');//]]>
</script>

<script src="http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jquery.ui/1.8.24/jquery-ui.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
//<![CDATA[
(!!window.jQuery.ui && !!window.jQuery.ui.version)||document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="Scripts/jquery-ui-1.8.24.js"><\/script>');//]]>
</script>

What? You want to use your own CDN? or Googles? Sure, just make a ScriptResourceMapping and put in whatever you want. You can make new ones, replace old ones, put in your success expression (what you check to make sure it worked), as well as your debug path and minified path.

var mapping = ScriptManager.ScriptResourceMapping;
// Map jquery definition to the Google CDN
mapping.AddDefinition("jquery", new ScriptResourceDefinition
{
Path = "~/Scripts/jquery-2.0.0.min.js",
DebugPath = "~/Scripts/jquery-2.0.0.js",
CdnPath = "http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.0.0/jquery.min.js",
CdnDebugPath = "https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.0.0/jquery.js",
CdnSupportsSecureConnection = true,
LoadSuccessExpression = "window.jQuery"
});

// Map jquery ui definition to the Google CDN
mapping.AddDefinition("jquery.ui.combined", new ScriptResourceDefinition
{
Path = "~/Scripts/jquery-ui-1.10.2.min.js",
DebugPath = "~/Scripts/jquery-ui-1.10.2.js",
CdnPath = "http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.10.2/jquery-ui.min.js",
CdnDebugPath = "http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.10.2/jquery-ui.js",
CdnSupportsSecureConnection = true,
LoadSuccessExpression = "window.jQuery && window.jQuery.ui && window.jQuery.ui.version === '1.10.2'"
});

I just do this mapping once, and now any ScriptManager control application-wide gets the update and outputs the correct fallback.

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.0.0/jquery.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
//<![CDATA[
(window.jQuery)||document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="Scripts/jquery-2.0.0.js"><\/script>');//]]>
</script>

<script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.10.2/jquery-ui.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
//<![CDATA[
(window.jQuery && window.jQuery.ui && window.jQuery.ui.version === '1.10.2')||document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="Scripts/jquery-ui-1.10.2.js"><\/script>');//]]>
</script>

If you want to use jQuery 2.0.0 or a newer version than what came with ASP.NET 4.5, you'll want to update your NuGet packages for ScriptManager. These include the config info about the CDN locations. To update (or check your current version against the current) within Visual Studio go to Tools | Library Package Manager | Manage Libraries for Solution, and click on Updates on the left there.

image

Updated ASP.NET Web Optimization Framework includes CDN Fallback

If you're using ASP.NET MVC, you can update the included Microsoft.AspNet.Web.Optimization package to the -prerelease (as of these writing) to get CDN fallback as well.

Get Optimization Updates by "including PreRelease"

Note that I've on the Updates tab within the Manage NuGet Packages dialog but I've selected "Include Prerelease."

Now in my BundleConfig I can setup my bundles to include not only the CdnPath but also a CdnFallbackExpression:

public static void RegisterBundles(BundleCollection bundles)
{
bundles.UseCdn = true;
BundleTable.EnableOptimizations = true; //force optimization while debugging

var jquery = new ScriptBundle("~/bundles/jquery", "//ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jquery/jquery-2.0.0.min.js").Include(
"~/Scripts/jquery-{version}.js");
jquery.CdnFallbackExpression = "window.jQuery";
bundles.Add(jquery);
//...
}

Regardless of how you do it, remember when you setup Pingdom or other availability alerts that you should be testing your Content Delivery Network as well, from multiple locations. In this case, the CDN failure was extremely localized and relatively short but it could have been worse. A fallback technique like this would have allowed sites (like mine) to easily weather the storm.

About Scott

Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. I am a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.

facebook twitter subscribe
About   Newsletter
Sponsored By
Hosting By
Dedicated Windows Server Hosting by ORCS Web

Pinching pennies when scaling in The Cloud

March 30, '13 Comments [43] Posted in Azure | Javascript
Sponsored By
The new Hanselminutes Site

Running a site in the cloud and paying for CPU time with pennies and fractions of pennies is a fascinating way to profile your app. I mean, we all should be profiling our apps, right? Really paying attention to what the CPU does and how many database connections are main, what memory usage is like, but we don't. If that code doesn't affect your pocketbook directly, you're less likely to bother.

Interestingly, I find myself performing optimizations driving my hybrid car or dealing with my smartphone's limited data plan. When resources are truly scarce and (most importantly) money is on the line, one finds ways - both clever and obvious - to optimize and cut costs.

Sloppy Code in the Cloud Costs Money

I have a MSDN Subscription which includes quite a bit of free Azure Cloud time. Make sure you've turned this on if you have MSDN yourself. This subscription is under my personal account and I pay if it goes over (I don't get a free pass just because I work for the cloud group) so I want to pay as little as possible if I can.

One of the classic and obvious rules of scaling a system is "do less, and you can do more of it." When you apply this idea to the money you're paying to host your system in the cloud, you want to do as little as possible to stretch your dollar. You pay pennies for CPU time, pennies for bandwidth and pennies for database access - but it adds up. If you're opening database connection a loop, transferring more data than is necessary, you'll pay.

I recently worked with designer Jin Yang and redesigned this blog, made a new home page, and the Hanselminutes Podcast site. In the process we had the idea for a more personal archives page that makes the eponymous show less about me and visually more about the guests. I'm in the process of going through 360+ shows and getting pictures of the guests for each one.

I launched the site and I think it looks great. However, I noticed immediately that the Data Out was REALLY high compared to the old site. I host the MP3s elsewhere, but the images put out almost 500 megs in just hours after the new site was launched.

You can guess from the figure when I launched the new site.

I used way too much bandwidth this day

I *rarely* have to pay for extra bandwidth, but this wasn't looking good. One of the nice things about Azure is that you can view your bill any day, not just at the end of the month. I could see that I was inching up on the outgoing bandwidth. At this rate, I was going to have to pay extra at the end of the month.

Almost out of outbound bandwidth

I thought about it, then realized, duh, I'm loading 360+ images every time someone hits the archives page. It's obvious, of course, in retrospect. But remember that I moved my site into the cloud for two reasons.

  • Save money
  • Scale quickly when I need to

I added caching for all the database calls, which was trivia, but thought about the images thing for a while. I could add paging, or I could make a "just in time" infinite scroll. I dislike paging in this instance as I think folks like to CTRL-F on a large page when the dataset isn't overwhelmingly large.

ASIDE: It's on my list to add "topic tagging" and client-side sorting and filtering for the shows on Hanselminutes. I think this will be a nice addition to the back catalog. I'm also looking at better ways to utilize the growing transcript library. Any thoughts on that?

The easy solution was to lazy load the images as the user scrolls, thereby only using bandwidth for the images you see. I looked at Mike Tupola's jQuery LazyLoad plugin as well as a number of other similar scripts. There's also Luis Almeida's lightweight Unveil if you want fewer bells and whistles. I ended up using the standard Lazy Load.

Implementation was trivial. Add the script:

<script src="//ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jQuery/jquery-1.7.2.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="/jquery.lazyload.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>

Then, give the lazy load plugin a selector. You can say "just images in this div" or "just images with this class" however you like. I chose to do this:

<script>
$(function() {
$("img.lazy").lazyload({effect: "fadeIn"});
});
</script>

The most important part is that the img element that you generate should include a TINY image for the src. That src= will always be loaded, no matter what, since that's what browsers do. Don't believe any lazy loading solution that says otherwise. I use the 1px gray image from the github repo. Also, if you can, set the final height and width of the image  you're loading to ease layout.

<a href="/363/html5-javascript-chrome-and-the-web-platform-with-paul-irish" class="showCard">
<img data-original="/images/shows/363.jpg" class="lazy" src="/images/grey.gif" width="212" height="212" alt="HTML5, JavaScript, Chrome and the Web Platform with Paul Irish" />
<span class="shownumber">363</span>
<div class="overlay">HTML5, JavaScript, Chrome and the Web Platform with Paul Irish</div>
</a>

The image you're going to ultimately load is in the data-original attribute. It will be loaded when the area when the image is supposed to be enters the current viewport. You can set the threshold and cause the images to load a littler earlier if you prefer, like perhaps 200 pixels before it's visible.

$("img.lazy").lazyload({ threshold : 200 });

After I added this change, I let it run for a day and it chilled out my server completely. There isn't that intense burst of 300+ requests for images and bandwidth is way down.

image

10 Websites in 1 VM vs 10 Websites in Shared Mode

I'm running 10 websites on Azure, currently. One of the things that isn't obvious (unless you read) in the pricing calculator is that when you switch to a Reserved Instances on one of your Azure Websites, all of your other shared sites within that datacenter will jump into that reserved VM. You can actually run up to 100 (!) websites in that VM instance and this ends up saving you money.

Aside: It's nice also that these websites are 'in' that one VM, but I don't need to manage or ever think about that VM. Azure Websites sits on top of the VM and it's automatically updated and managed for me. I deploy to some of these websites with Git, some with Web Deploy, and some I update via FTP. I can also scale the VM dynamically and all the Websites get the benefit.

Think about it this way, running 1 Small VM on Azure with up to 100 websites (again, I have 10 today)...

1 VM for $57.60

...is cheaper than running those same 10 websites in Shared Mode.

10 shared websites for $93.60

This pricing is as of March 30, 2013 for those of you in the future.

The point here being, you can squeeze a LOT out of a small VM, and I plan to keep squeezing, caching, and optimizing as much as I can so I can pay as little as possible in the Cloud. If I can get this VM to do less, then I will be able to run more sites on it and save money.

The result of all this is that I'm starting to code differently now that I can see the pennies add up based on a specific changes.

About Scott

Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. I am a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.

facebook twitter subscribe
About   Newsletter
Sponsored By
Hosting By
Dedicated Windows Server Hosting by ORCS Web

Fallback HTML5 audio tags for a simple MP3 podcast are harder than you'd think

March 26, '13 Comments [29] Posted in HTML5 | Javascript
Sponsored By

I've been spending the evenings and weekends lately redesigning the blog and the Hanselminutes podcast site. I hadn't realized how cheesy looking the podcast site was all these years. I'd like to get the show expanded to a wider audience as I feel that listenership has kind of flattened lately. I am in the process of adding faces for ALL 360+ shows going back 6 years.

A big thanks to Lynsey Smith from Portland Girl Geek Dinners, by the way, for her hard work in finding pics for me!

I also wanted a nicer in-browser audio experience so I assumed I'd just drop in the audio tag and be done, right?

The HTML5 Audio tag is wonderful, right? Just works. This is the dream:

<audio id="audioplayer" preload="metadata" type="audio/mp3" >
<source src="http://s3.amazonaws.com/hanselminutes/hanselminutes_0363.mp3" type="audio/mp3"/>
Your browser doesn't support the HTML audio tag. Be sad.
</audio>

You can try that live at http://jsfiddle.net/CdxbX/ if you like.

Except it's not nearly that easy.

Here's what you'll see on IE9+:

image

Here's Chrome:

image

Here's Firefox, version 19:

Ya, Firefox currently doesn't support MP3 audio so it just flashes once then disappears. Firefox will support MP3s in audio soon though by using the underlying operating system to play the stream rather than its own embedded code.

In Firefox 20 (the beta channel) on Windows 7 and above, you can test MP3 Audio support by turning on the preference media.windows-media-foundation.enabled in about:config.

The part I was disappointed in was more of an HTML5 specification issue. Notice that while I have fallback text present, I don't see it in Firefox. That's because fallback elements are only used if your browser doesn't support the audio tag at all.

It doesn't do what I would expect at all. What I want is "Can you support any of these audio sources? No? Fallback." This seems intuitive to me.

I talked to Chris Double via Christian Heilmann at Mozilla and he said "You'd need to raise the issue with WHATWG/W3C. It's been debated before in the past. " Indeed it has. From Oct 2009, more people saying that it's not intuitive to fall back in this way:

I expected (incorrectly, in this case) that if I only produced one source element (an MP4), Firefox would drop down to use the fallback content, as it does if I include an object element for a format not supported (for example, if I include a QuickTime object and QT is not installed, the user sees fallback content). As far as I can see, the only option in this situation is to rely on Javascript and the video element's canPlayType() function. - Kit Grose

This lack of an intuitive fallback means that I can't make an audio player that works everywhere using just HTML. I have to use JavaScript, which is a bummer for such a fundamental scenario.

Getting HTML5 audio to fall back correctly in all browsers

Instead you have to make an audio tag dynamically, then interrogate the tag. This applies to both audio and video tags. I ended up using some code from my friend Matt Coneybeare.

<audio id="audioplayer" preload controls loop>
<source src="audio.mp3">
</audio>
<script type="text/javascript">
var audioTag = document.createElement('audio');
if (!(!!(audioTag.canPlayType) && ("no" != audioTag.canPlayType("audio/mpeg")) && ("" != audioTag.canPlayType("audio/mpeg")))) {
AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer", {soundFile: "audio.mp3"});
}
</script>

The AudioPlayer.embed at the end there is the WordPress AudioPlayer in standalone form. This way on Firefox I get the flash player since it answered false to canPlayType.

Flash audio player in Firefox

A Responsive and Touch-Friendly Audio Player in HTML5

However, the default audio player made by the <audio> tag is kind of lame, and I'd like it to better support touch, look great on tablets, etc. For this, I'll turn to Osvaldas Valutis's AudioPlayer. It's a nice little jQuery plugin that replaces the <audio> element with a lovely chunk of HTML. Since you can't actually style the HTML5 <audio> element, people just hide it, recreate it, then broker calls over to the hidden-but-still-working audio element.

This plugin, along with a little CSS styling of its default colors gives me a nice audio player that looks the same and works everywhere. Except Firefox 19/20 until the next version Firefox answers true to "canPlayType" and then it should just start working! Until then, it's the Flash fallback player, which works nicely as well.

image

The other problem is the QuickTime plugin that most Firefox users have installed. When styling with the Osvaldas' AudioPlayer, the JavaScript interrogation would cause Firefox will prompt folks to install it in some cases if it's not there, and it still doesn't work if it is installed.

I ended up modifying Matt's detection a little to work with this Osvaldas' styling. I realize the code could be more dynamic with less elements, but this was easier for me to read.

  • First, try the audio tag. Works? Great, style it with audioPlayer();
  • Can't do MP3 audio? Dynamically make a Flash player with that P. Hide the audio player (likely not needed.)

Unfortunately for readability, there's the ".audioPlayer" jQuery plugin that styles the HTML and there's the "AudioPlayer" flash embed. They are different but named the same. I didn't change them. ;)

<audio id="audioplayer" preload="auto" controls style="width:100%;" >
<source src="your.mp3" type="audio/mp3">
Your browser doesn't support the HTML audio tag. You can still download the show, though!
</audio>
<p id="audioplayer_1"></p>
<script type="text/javascript">
var audioTag = document.createElement('audio');
/* Do we not support MP3 audio? If not, dynamically made a Flash SWF player. */
if (!(!!(audioTag.canPlayType) && ("no" != audioTag.canPlayType("audio/mpeg")) && ("" != audioTag.canPlayType("audio/mpeg")))) {
AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_1", {soundFile: "your.mp3", transparentpagebg: "yes"});
$( '#audioplayer').hide();
}
else /* Ok, we do support MP3 audio, style the audio tag into a touch-friendly player */
{
/* If we didn't do the "if mp3 supported" check above, this call would prompt Firefox install quicktime! */
$( '#audioplayer' ).audioPlayer();
}
</script>

All in all, it works pretty well so far.

ODD BUG: Chrome does seem to have some kind of hang where this audio player is getting blocked while the comments load on my site. Any JavaScript experts want to weight in? If you load a page - like this one - and hit play before the page is loaded, the audio doesn't play. This only happens in Chrome. Thoughts?

While you're here, check out the new http://hanselminutes.com and consider subscribing! It's "Fresh Air for Developers."

About Scott

Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. I am a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.

facebook twitter subscribe
About   Newsletter
Sponsored By
Hosting By
Dedicated Windows Server Hosting by ORCS Web

Why does TypeScript have to be the answer to anything?

October 2, '12 Comments [97] Posted in Javascript | Open Source
Sponsored By

vs-refactorDISCLAIMER: I don't work on TypeScript. I am not involved with that team and this is all my own opinion and conjecture.

UPDATE: After this post I sat down with Anders in Denmark at the GOTO 2012 Conference sin Aarhus and asked him bunch of questions about TypeScript. That recorded audio podcast is now available.

TypeScript was announced and folks are saying "TypeScript is clearly Microsoft's answer to Google's Dart" or "So TypeScript is Microsoft's answer to CoffeeScript."

I was chatting with Jez Humble today about the intense interest and some little gnashing of teeth around TypeScript and he offered this little gem of a quote:

It's disappointing when smart people display a profound ignorance of computing history. - Jez Humble

TypeScript has been out a day. It's way early to see if it has legs, but it seems initially promising.

TypeScript and Dart

People have compared TypeScript to Dart. That's comparing apples to carburetors. TypeScript builds on JavaScript so there's no JS interop issues. Dart is a native virtual machine written from scratch. Dart interops with JavaScript...but it's not JS. It doesn't even use the JavaScript number type for example.

TypeScript and CoffeeScript

I'm a huge CoffeeScript fan although it is a different language with a syntax of its own to learn. What I like about TypeScript - so far - is that TypeScript’s static typing could enable better tooling with warning squiggles, easy statement completion, plus smart refactoring. You also get easy navigation around code, as well as find references, rename, and more. You don’t currently get that in CoffeeScript.

So what is TypeScript?

TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript and you write it like you write JavaScript which I like. Any existing JavaScript is already TypeScript. One argument has been made that TypeScript is for people who don't want to learn JavaScript. I don't buy that. As Ward Bell said in an email:

TypeScript is not a crutch any more than JSLint is a crutch. It doesn’t hide JavaScript (as CoffeeScript tends to do). - Ward Bell

I think Ward says it well. Folks rail against static typing but they don't complain about JSLint. TypeScript offers optional type annotations - it's hardly a perversion of JavaScript.

From what I can see after using TypeScript for a few days is this. It gives you type checking, explicit interfaces and easier module exports. In fact, it's a little like getting some of tomorrow's ECMAScript 6 early in a way that's compatible with today's JavaScript. ES6 won't be out for at least a year but we can play with some of those features today.

Things that I like about TypeScript:

  • It's Open Source and under the Apache 2.0 license
  • You can install the tools easily with
    • npm install typescript -g
  • You can git the source
    • git clone https://git01.codeplex.com/typescript 
  • You can play with it online at http://www.typescriptlang.org/Playground

Things I don't like about TypeScript (these are mostly implementation things)

  • No splitscreen editor like Visual Studio's existing CoffeeScript editor
    • UPDATE: While this isn't "official" support, Mads has updated Web Essentials 2012 with a splitscreen editor. The two teams are going to work together on a more official solution.
  • Doesn't generate .js on save, requires a build.
  • You have to add a BeforeBuild target to your ASP.NET application's CSPROJ:
<Target Name="BeforeBuild">
<Exec Command="&quot;$(PROGRAMFILES)\Microsoft SDKs\TypeScript\0.8.0.0\tsc&quot; @(TypeScriptCompile ->'&quot;%(fullpath)&quot;', ' ')" />
</Target>

I will continue to use TypeScript and evaluate it, but I think the fact that it's open source, it creates JavaScript and it feels comfortable to me as a C# programmer means it will fill a useful niche.

This quote from Luke Hoban, co-creator of TypeScript really hits the spot.

"CoffeeScript is to Ruby as TypeScript is to Java/C#/C++." - Luke Hoban

If you love Ruby, you'll enjoy CoffeeScript as it makes the JavaScript more like the Ruby. The same is true with TypeScript. It brings useful features into JavaScript in an ultimately compatible and syntax-friendly way using language constructs you're comfortable with.

About Scott

Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. I am a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.

facebook twitter subscribe
About   Newsletter
Sponsored By
Hosting By
Dedicated Windows Server Hosting by ORCS Web

Making a switchable Desktop and Mobile site with ASP.NET MVC 4 and jQuery Mobile

October 1, '12 Comments [23] Posted in ASP.NET | ASP.NET MVC | Javascript | Mobile
Sponsored By

I really enjoy working on and thinking about mobile websites. There's something about making an experience great on a pocket supercomputer phone that is so much more satisfying than a desktop. I actually got this blog looking nice on mobile devices back in 2006 when nobody was mobile except doctors and, well, all of us techies here on the blogs.

I've talked about the importance of a good mobile site before in posts like Create a great mobile experience for your website today. Please. However, some folks had asked me if I'd do a post on how to do a combination Desktop and Mobile site using ASP.NET MVC similar to the examples I used in my talks in Russia on mobile earlier this year. (There's video of those ASP.NET mobile presentations available)

When you start Visual Studio 2012 and go File | New ASP.NET MVC 4 app, there's an Internet Application template and a Mobile template. One gets you a standard desktop site - although with responsive design elements so it works on small screens - and the other gets you a jQuery Mobile application meant primarily for phones and tablets. Let's make one that switches between both.

We will do a small site in ASP.NET MVC for the Desktop, do some quick DB access, add jQuery Mobile and a View Switcher switch back and forth. I'll be using the Electric Mobile Studio from Electric Plum to simulate an iPhone. You can get a 7 day trial or you can get the Lite version of the Electric Plum Mobile Simulator with WebMatrix 2.

Quick CRUD Example

First, a model for DVDs.

public class DVD
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public int Year { get; set; }
public Rating rating { get; set; }
}

public enum Rating
{
G, PG, PG13, R
}

Next, I scaffold out the Index, Create, Edit, Delete, etc. Unfortunately scaffolding doesn't do Enums (I'm sad) for my Movie Ratings so I add EditorFor() calls to my Create and Edits, and update my Index.

<div class="editor-label">
@Html.LabelFor(model => model.rating)
</div>
<div class="editor-field">
@Html.EditorFor(model => model.rating)
@Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.rating)
</div>

Shared/EditorTemplates/Rating.cshtmlI could have used DropDownList I suppose, but I have always found that helper confusing. Instead, I'll create a Rating.cshtml that makes a dropdown. I could change this at some future point to be fancier and not even use a DropDown.

Aside: How do you guys usually handle Enums? I've seen it done a few ways. I'd like this to be more generic, but here's what I did for the Rating editor Template. Note the nullable ? as it has to work for both Create and Delete

@model MyApp.Models.Rating?
@using MyApp.Models

<select id="@ViewData.TemplateInfo.GetFullHtmlFieldId("")" name="@ViewData.TemplateInfo.GetFullHtmlFieldName("")">
@foreach (int rating in Enum.GetValues(typeof(Rating))) {
var name = Enum.GetName(typeof(Rating), rating);
<option value="@name" selected="@(Model.HasValue ? (int)Model == rating : false)">@name</option>
}
</select>

OK, so there's a basic Desktop CRUD app.

Editing a DVD List of DVDs

Making it Mobile

iPhone in the Visual Studio browser menuAs I mentioned, you've probably noticed when making an ASP.NET MVC application that you can choose a Mobile template with jQuery Mobile along with the standard responsive "desktop" Internet Application. However, there isn't a switchable template. That is, one that is the regular template on Desktops but switches to jQuery Mobile (or KendoUI, or whatever makes you happy) on mobile devices.

Using NuGet, install the jQuery.Mobile.MVC package. You can either right click on References, select Manage NuGet Packages, or you can use the Package Manager Console and type:

install-package jQuery.Mobile.MVC

This package will automatically bring in jQuery Mobile as well as:

  • A ViewSwitcher partial view and supporting Controller
    • This is what lets us switch manually between Desktop and Mobile
  • A basic _Layout.Mobile.cshtml and supporting stylesheet
  • A BundleMobileConfig.cs used with ASP.NET Optimization (the bundler for CSS and JS)

NOTE: There's nothing jQuery Mobile specific about the ViewSwitcher or the techniques here. You can happily change this package for any other popular mobile framework.

We start by adding the new Bundles in the Global.asax:

BundleConfig.RegisterBundles(BundleTable.Bundles);
BundleMobileConfig.RegisterBundles(BundleTable.Bundles); // <-- ADD THIS ONE

Since I installed the Electric Plum iPhone simulator, I'll select it from my browser dropdown in Visual Studio and run my app and navigate to /DVD.

The system sees that I'm on a mobile device and rather than using _Layout.cshtml it uses _Layout.mobile.cshtml.

This doesn't really look nice for a few reasons. First, I don't like the default style. Just go into _Layout.Mobile.cshtml and change the data-theme attribute to a value that makes you happy. I changed it from theme a to theme b.

Basic App in an iPhoneSame baisic app with a light background

Second, while I'm using the _Layout.Mobile.cshtml I'm still using the desktop Index.cshtml which looks lousy when displayed in the mobile layout. Remember that I only have an single Index.cshtml. If I had an Index.mobile.cshtml the system would use that page instead when rendering on a mobile device.

I can make an Index.Mobile.cshtml with simpler markup, change the table into an unordered list and add some jQuery Mobile specific attributes like this:

@model IEnumerable<MvcApplication2.Models.DVD>
@{
ViewBag.Title = "My DVDs";
}
<ul data-role="listview" data-filter="true" >
@foreach (var item in Model) {
<li>
<a href="@Url.Action("Details", new { item.ID })">
<h2>@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Title)</h2>
<p>@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Year) - @Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.rating)</p>
</a>
</li>
}
</ul>

Note the data-role and very basic elements like <ul>, <li>, <h2< and <p>. I also added the client side data-filter attribute to get some nice client-side searching. Hit refresh and now it's starting to look like a real mobile site.

See the ViewSwitcher at the top there? That's a partial view called _ViewSwitcher.cshtml.

A lovely jQuery Mobile example list of DVDs

By default it will let you switch back and forth between Desktop and Mobile but only on mobile devices. Why? Check out the first line of code:

@if (Request.Browser.IsMobileDevice && Request.HttpMethod == "GET")
{
<div class="view-switcher ui-bar-a">
@if (ViewContext.HttpContext.GetOverriddenBrowser().IsMobileDevice)
{
@: Displaying mobile view
@Html.ActionLink("Desktop view", "SwitchView", "ViewSwitcher", new { mobile = false, returnUrl = Request.Url.PathAndQuery }, new { rel = "external" })
}
else
{
@: Displaying desktop view
@Html.ActionLink("Mobile view", "SwitchView", "ViewSwitcher", new { mobile = true, returnUrl = Request.Url.PathAndQuery }, new { rel = "external" })
}
</div>
}

That first line checks if it's a mobile device making the request. Just surround that with /* comments */ and you'll be able to view and debug mobile layouts with your desktop browser without faking User Agents.

So far we've been talking about "mobile" and creating files with "mobile" in their file names and it's all been magic. Turns out we have lots of control over these things. Perhaps we want more than Index.mobile.cshtml but also, perhaps, Index.iPhone.cshtml and Index.WP7.cshtml.

Create lines like these in your Global.asax:

DisplayModeProvider.Instance.Modes.Insert(0, new DefaultDisplayMode("WP7") {
ContextCondition = ctx => ctx.GetOverriddenUserAgent().Contains("Windows Phone OS")
});
DisplayModeProvider.Instance.Modes.Insert(0, new DefaultDisplayMode("iPhone") {
ContextCondition = ctx => ctx.GetOverriddenUserAgent().Contains("iPhone")
});

You can affect the DisplayMode collection (of which "mobile" is one) by inserting in your own. Here I'm making two more specific mobile ones but you don't need to do mobile things to change DisplayModes.  A DisplayMode could be right to left for RTL languages, or "gold" and "bronze" for customers or whatever makes you happy, based on the ContextCondition you evaluate on each request.

There's lots of choices and you've got the flexibility to do things however you like. I'll show an example of a totally offline iPhone site using cache.manifest in a future post.

Related Links

About Scott

Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. I am a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.

facebook twitter subscribe
About   Newsletter
Sponsored By
Hosting By
Dedicated Windows Server Hosting by ORCS Web
Page 1 of 20 in the Javascript category Next Page

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.